<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for David Englin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidenglin.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidenglin.org</link>
	<description>Virginia State Delegate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOT Lanes Update: Share your views on the Shirlington Rotary proposal by Mark D.</title>
		<link>http://www.davidenglin.org/2009/06/26/hot-lanes/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidenglin.org/?p=1934#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I certainly hope that the Civic Associations are gearing up to comment on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and are preparing to fight it adminstratively and in court, if necessary.  Do not expect VDOT or the contractors to do all of the studies needed to demonstrate compliance to your satisfaction.  Citizens need to be vigilant and use the tools the National Environmental Act gives to us.  When the City of Alexandria put useless and unneeded speed humps onto my quiet residential street, they did so without doing any kind of documented testing and the city officials involved were rather cavalier about it.  Speak loudly, speak consistently and be prepared for a long fight.  Its the only way.  Clearly, this project would have significant impacts in a number of the areas that must be measured and factored into an EIS.  This is a truly bad idea, particularly before anything is done to relieve the existing traffic problems at the Quaker/King/ Braddock intersection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly hope that the Civic Associations are gearing up to comment on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and are preparing to fight it adminstratively and in court, if necessary.  Do not expect VDOT or the contractors to do all of the studies needed to demonstrate compliance to your satisfaction.  Citizens need to be vigilant and use the tools the National Environmental Act gives to us.  When the City of Alexandria put useless and unneeded speed humps onto my quiet residential street, they did so without doing any kind of documented testing and the city officials involved were rather cavalier about it.  Speak loudly, speak consistently and be prepared for a long fight.  Its the only way.  Clearly, this project would have significant impacts in a number of the areas that must be measured and factored into an EIS.  This is a truly bad idea, particularly before anything is done to relieve the existing traffic problems at the Quaker/King/ Braddock intersection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOT Lanes Update: Share your views on the Shirlington Rotary proposal by Greg Cota</title>
		<link>http://www.davidenglin.org/2009/06/26/hot-lanes/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Cota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidenglin.org/?p=1934#comment-90</guid>
		<description>As a resident of Parkfairfax, I want to express my concerns about the significant changes slated for Shirlington Circle as part of the proposed I-395 HOT lanes project.
 
Multi-Year Construction.  VDOT anticipates it could take five years to add new lanes and lights to Shirlington Circle – subjecting Parkfairfax and Fairlington residents to considerable noise and pollution during construction and once the HOT lanes open.  In addition, we could lose buffer trees and nature space to construction staging and sound barrier installation because VDOT owns most of the land adjacent to Quaker Lane and Shirlington Circle.  

Six Traffic Lights.  To accommodate a new northbound HOT lanes off-ramp, VDOT would need to install traffic lights at all six of the feeder intersections.  These new lights would create a headache for drivers going around the circle, and we would see traffic backing up on Gunston, Martha Custis, Quaker Lane, and Preston.  To avoid congestion on the circle, frustrated motorists might cut through Parkfairfax to Glebe Road – as they do now when there is an incident on I-395.  

Pedestrian Bridge.  At Arlington’s request, VDOT is considering changes to pedestrian access across I-395.  Ideas currently under debate include adding sidewalks around the circle (extending traffic light cycles), lengthening the pedestrian bridge ramps (taking land in Parkfairfax), and removing or replacing the pedestrian bridge.    

Del. Englin, please work with VDOT and Parkfairfax&#039;s new HOT lanes task force to minimize these substantial impacts on our community.  Thank you for your consideration of these concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a resident of Parkfairfax, I want to express my concerns about the significant changes slated for Shirlington Circle as part of the proposed I-395 HOT lanes project.</p>
<p>Multi-Year Construction.  VDOT anticipates it could take five years to add new lanes and lights to Shirlington Circle – subjecting Parkfairfax and Fairlington residents to considerable noise and pollution during construction and once the HOT lanes open.  In addition, we could lose buffer trees and nature space to construction staging and sound barrier installation because VDOT owns most of the land adjacent to Quaker Lane and Shirlington Circle.  </p>
<p>Six Traffic Lights.  To accommodate a new northbound HOT lanes off-ramp, VDOT would need to install traffic lights at all six of the feeder intersections.  These new lights would create a headache for drivers going around the circle, and we would see traffic backing up on Gunston, Martha Custis, Quaker Lane, and Preston.  To avoid congestion on the circle, frustrated motorists might cut through Parkfairfax to Glebe Road – as they do now when there is an incident on I-395.  </p>
<p>Pedestrian Bridge.  At Arlington’s request, VDOT is considering changes to pedestrian access across I-395.  Ideas currently under debate include adding sidewalks around the circle (extending traffic light cycles), lengthening the pedestrian bridge ramps (taking land in Parkfairfax), and removing or replacing the pedestrian bridge.    </p>
<p>Del. Englin, please work with VDOT and Parkfairfax&#8217;s new HOT lanes task force to minimize these substantial impacts on our community.  Thank you for your consideration of these concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOT Lanes Update: Share your views on the Shirlington Rotary proposal by Devin Arloski</title>
		<link>http://www.davidenglin.org/2009/06/26/hot-lanes/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Arloski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidenglin.org/?p=1934#comment-87</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;ve ever been to the Park Fairfax community where I live, you would know that a plan like this needs further examination to ensure that there would be no traffic backup in our neighborhood or traffic due to toll fee skippers.  Please Mr. Englin, take a stand against this plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve ever been to the Park Fairfax community where I live, you would know that a plan like this needs further examination to ensure that there would be no traffic backup in our neighborhood or traffic due to toll fee skippers.  Please Mr. Englin, take a stand against this plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOT Lanes Update: Share your views on the Shirlington Rotary proposal by Jennifer B.</title>
		<link>http://www.davidenglin.org/2009/06/26/hot-lanes/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidenglin.org/?p=1934#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Dear Delegate Englin,

I also live in Parkfairfax and I commute via the DASH bus to the Pentagon daily during rush hours. Having witnessed the flow of traffic day in and day out, I concur with others that have stated how disasterous adding traffic lights to Shirlington Circle would be. Vehicles will undoubtedly back up all around the circle and in every adjoining side street causing gridlock in our neighborhood. Noise and air pollution will be greater factors for residents to contend with. I&#039;m sure these elements will also decrease property values/assessments which is no good for the local economy. 

It&#039;s terrific when local and state representatives talk about promoting public transit, the desire to reduce air pollution, and being responsive to their consitutents. I hope you and others will see that the proposed HOT Lanes at the Shirlington Circle does not serve any of these objectives. Thank you for the information you&#039;ve provided on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Delegate Englin,</p>
<p>I also live in Parkfairfax and I commute via the DASH bus to the Pentagon daily during rush hours. Having witnessed the flow of traffic day in and day out, I concur with others that have stated how disasterous adding traffic lights to Shirlington Circle would be. Vehicles will undoubtedly back up all around the circle and in every adjoining side street causing gridlock in our neighborhood. Noise and air pollution will be greater factors for residents to contend with. I&#8217;m sure these elements will also decrease property values/assessments which is no good for the local economy. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s terrific when local and state representatives talk about promoting public transit, the desire to reduce air pollution, and being responsive to their consitutents. I hope you and others will see that the proposed HOT Lanes at the Shirlington Circle does not serve any of these objectives. Thank you for the information you&#8217;ve provided on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOT Lanes Update: Share your views on the Shirlington Rotary proposal by Laura Dove</title>
		<link>http://www.davidenglin.org/2009/06/26/hot-lanes/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Dove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidenglin.org/?p=1934#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I am a resident of Fairlington Green and my property is adjacent to Quaker Lane (i.e., I can see the traffic from my living room windows.)  I concur with the other owners who have identified the traffic flow problems which will be created by VDOTs proposed hot lanes.  

I am very concerned that the increased traffic will negatively affect the quality of life in our area by increasing the noise levels and pollution.  

The level of noise from I-395 and Quaker Lane has grown considerably with the revitalization of the Shirlington shopping area and the introduction of new condominiums and businesses.  

The current traffic flow results in high levels of pollution and carbon emissions which can readily be seen in the evergreen trees on Quaker Lane.  Further increasing the traffic flow means higher emissions and worsening air quality.

At minimum, VDOT needs to invest in sound barriers and increased vegetation to absorb the additional noise and help filter the increased pollution that will come with the increased traffic flow.  Furthermore, the sound barriers need to be put in place prior to beginning construction.

While I do not relish living in a &quot;walled in&quot; community, it is far preferable to living in the midst of traffic.

Without VDOT taking steps to insure that the noise levels are mitigated to the fullest extent possible, homeowners can also expect a decrease in property values.

PLEASE demand that the quality of life in our area is preserved and that every possible step is taken to limit the impact of VDOTs proposal.

Thank you for taking on this cause and working on behalf of our residents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a resident of Fairlington Green and my property is adjacent to Quaker Lane (i.e., I can see the traffic from my living room windows.)  I concur with the other owners who have identified the traffic flow problems which will be created by VDOTs proposed hot lanes.  </p>
<p>I am very concerned that the increased traffic will negatively affect the quality of life in our area by increasing the noise levels and pollution.  </p>
<p>The level of noise from I-395 and Quaker Lane has grown considerably with the revitalization of the Shirlington shopping area and the introduction of new condominiums and businesses.  </p>
<p>The current traffic flow results in high levels of pollution and carbon emissions which can readily be seen in the evergreen trees on Quaker Lane.  Further increasing the traffic flow means higher emissions and worsening air quality.</p>
<p>At minimum, VDOT needs to invest in sound barriers and increased vegetation to absorb the additional noise and help filter the increased pollution that will come with the increased traffic flow.  Furthermore, the sound barriers need to be put in place prior to beginning construction.</p>
<p>While I do not relish living in a &#8220;walled in&#8221; community, it is far preferable to living in the midst of traffic.</p>
<p>Without VDOT taking steps to insure that the noise levels are mitigated to the fullest extent possible, homeowners can also expect a decrease in property values.</p>
<p>PLEASE demand that the quality of life in our area is preserved and that every possible step is taken to limit the impact of VDOTs proposal.</p>
<p>Thank you for taking on this cause and working on behalf of our residents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOT Lanes Update: Share your views on the Shirlington Rotary proposal by jeff burton</title>
		<link>http://www.davidenglin.org/2009/06/26/hot-lanes/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidenglin.org/?p=1934#comment-61</guid>
		<description>As I see it, all this does is move the traffic jam from the Pentagon area to Shirlington.  What is needed is more incentives and better service from Mass transit systems and routing through traffic, not bound for DC to the outer loop.  Regardless of the design or location of lights, etc., necking traffic from more to fewer lanes will cause backups and traffic jams and this proposal just moves it back to Shirlington and allows for even more cars to be backed up.  Why doesn&#039;t DC set the standard for urban transport and require the use of mass transit and non-motorized transport (bicycle, walk).  If the only people driving cars into/out of the city were its residents then there would be no issue or need for huge outlays of money for road construction and we could use the money instead to improve the Metro system and non-motorized access to the City.  DC is unique in that the use of alternative transportation can be mandated by Congress.  The Nation&#039;s Capitol should be the place where major positive changes should be embraced (recycling, mass transit, etc.) and showcased if we want to see them embraced by the States and their metropolitan areas.  If it&#039;s not good enough for our government, why should they do it?  Our Nation&#039;s Capitol should lead by example, even if it&#039;s uncomfortable for our legislators.  And VA should demand compensation from the Feds for the impact of the Capitol on its infrastructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I see it, all this does is move the traffic jam from the Pentagon area to Shirlington.  What is needed is more incentives and better service from Mass transit systems and routing through traffic, not bound for DC to the outer loop.  Regardless of the design or location of lights, etc., necking traffic from more to fewer lanes will cause backups and traffic jams and this proposal just moves it back to Shirlington and allows for even more cars to be backed up.  Why doesn&#8217;t DC set the standard for urban transport and require the use of mass transit and non-motorized transport (bicycle, walk).  If the only people driving cars into/out of the city were its residents then there would be no issue or need for huge outlays of money for road construction and we could use the money instead to improve the Metro system and non-motorized access to the City.  DC is unique in that the use of alternative transportation can be mandated by Congress.  The Nation&#8217;s Capitol should be the place where major positive changes should be embraced (recycling, mass transit, etc.) and showcased if we want to see them embraced by the States and their metropolitan areas.  If it&#8217;s not good enough for our government, why should they do it?  Our Nation&#8217;s Capitol should lead by example, even if it&#8217;s uncomfortable for our legislators.  And VA should demand compensation from the Feds for the impact of the Capitol on its infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOT Lanes Update: Share your views on the Shirlington Rotary proposal by Jim Hurysz</title>
		<link>http://www.davidenglin.org/2009/06/26/hot-lanes/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hurysz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidenglin.org/?p=1934#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I am very concerned about the impact that HOT lanes will have upon the quality of life, (and health) in my community, Fairlington, and adjacent communities. (Please note the ongoing BRAC construction in Mark Center, for an additional 11,000 federal employees). 

With or without HOT lanes there will be massive development in southern Spotsylvanis and Caroline Counties. Caroline County just opened a large and impressive economic development center. That is where affordable housing will be constructed during the next 20 years.  We may see 50,000 more vehicles using HOT lanes and the other lanes on I-95 and 395 during morning and evening rush hours. Rush hour traffic on I-95 is already bad. One reason for that is non-HOV I-95 southbound narrows from 6 lanes to 3 lanes between Springfield and Fairfax County Parkway.

We must have alternatives to the present system of development and redevelopment with the concomitant construction of 300 or more new parking spaces with every residential and commercial building. Last year Arlington County approved the construction of more than 4,000 new parking spaces concomitant with development and redevelopment. So far this year Arlington County government approved almost 1,000 new parking spaces for just three site plans. This type of development and redevelopment cannot be allowed to continue for much longer. We are in a scenario where people drive everywhere for everything, usually one to a vehicle. Our air quality is terrible already and will become much worse. Traffic congestion will become very bad.

What to do? I have spoken to VDOT and VDOT-hosted meetings and VDOT&#039;s only concern is roads and highways. But what is needed are alternatives that will take people out of their vehicles. These include: VRE extended to Caroling County in the I-95 corridor and to Orange in the Route-29 corridor. Much more telecommuting. Neighborhood ride sharing.  CNG-powered interurban bus service. Regular neighborhood bus service to and from shopping centers. Dedicated car service and van service from residential buildings to Metro, shopping plazas, malls, etc. Consider that at $20 per household the amount available to residents of a 300-unit condo building for traffic-mitigating transportation services would be $6,000 per month.  More home-delivery of food from supermarkets. On-site affordable housing for employees of retail shops and restaurants. 

Over the past 60 years our region has become so automobile-friendly that persuading citizens to make necessary changes won&#039;t be easy. That doesn&#039;t mean we shouldn&#039;t move forward. Thanks to Delegate Englin for his leadership on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very concerned about the impact that HOT lanes will have upon the quality of life, (and health) in my community, Fairlington, and adjacent communities. (Please note the ongoing BRAC construction in Mark Center, for an additional 11,000 federal employees). </p>
<p>With or without HOT lanes there will be massive development in southern Spotsylvanis and Caroline Counties. Caroline County just opened a large and impressive economic development center. That is where affordable housing will be constructed during the next 20 years.  We may see 50,000 more vehicles using HOT lanes and the other lanes on I-95 and 395 during morning and evening rush hours. Rush hour traffic on I-95 is already bad. One reason for that is non-HOV I-95 southbound narrows from 6 lanes to 3 lanes between Springfield and Fairfax County Parkway.</p>
<p>We must have alternatives to the present system of development and redevelopment with the concomitant construction of 300 or more new parking spaces with every residential and commercial building. Last year Arlington County approved the construction of more than 4,000 new parking spaces concomitant with development and redevelopment. So far this year Arlington County government approved almost 1,000 new parking spaces for just three site plans. This type of development and redevelopment cannot be allowed to continue for much longer. We are in a scenario where people drive everywhere for everything, usually one to a vehicle. Our air quality is terrible already and will become much worse. Traffic congestion will become very bad.</p>
<p>What to do? I have spoken to VDOT and VDOT-hosted meetings and VDOT&#8217;s only concern is roads and highways. But what is needed are alternatives that will take people out of their vehicles. These include: VRE extended to Caroling County in the I-95 corridor and to Orange in the Route-29 corridor. Much more telecommuting. Neighborhood ride sharing.  CNG-powered interurban bus service. Regular neighborhood bus service to and from shopping centers. Dedicated car service and van service from residential buildings to Metro, shopping plazas, malls, etc. Consider that at $20 per household the amount available to residents of a 300-unit condo building for traffic-mitigating transportation services would be $6,000 per month.  More home-delivery of food from supermarkets. On-site affordable housing for employees of retail shops and restaurants. </p>
<p>Over the past 60 years our region has become so automobile-friendly that persuading citizens to make necessary changes won&#8217;t be easy. That doesn&#8217;t mean we shouldn&#8217;t move forward. Thanks to Delegate Englin for his leadership on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOT Lanes Update: Share your views on the Shirlington Rotary proposal by Kelly Novak</title>
		<link>http://www.davidenglin.org/2009/06/26/hot-lanes/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Novak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidenglin.org/?p=1934#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I live in Parkfairfax.  I see a lot of accidents happen on the circle.  Adding in the light by the on ramp will probably help but something other than a light needs to happen over near the Shirlington business district side.  As far as traffic flow goes, morning is the worst on the circle.  Timing the light to accommodate the heaviest traffic flow times and keep traffic flowing at the lighter times.  It is a scary circle when cars are whizzing by and quite frankly I avoid it when I can using Glebe or going to the light on Preston when practical.  Finally, the sound barrier walls have to happen. It is ridiculous to hear this freeway noise all the way up to Beverly Hills.  Come on, I lived a good chunk of my life in southern Calif. and I know that sound barrier walls work great there, so why not here.  It is a good way to keep property value up, protect the viewshed to some degree and keep the area desirable to living standards.  Thanks for putting up this page for logging comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Parkfairfax.  I see a lot of accidents happen on the circle.  Adding in the light by the on ramp will probably help but something other than a light needs to happen over near the Shirlington business district side.  As far as traffic flow goes, morning is the worst on the circle.  Timing the light to accommodate the heaviest traffic flow times and keep traffic flowing at the lighter times.  It is a scary circle when cars are whizzing by and quite frankly I avoid it when I can using Glebe or going to the light on Preston when practical.  Finally, the sound barrier walls have to happen. It is ridiculous to hear this freeway noise all the way up to Beverly Hills.  Come on, I lived a good chunk of my life in southern Calif. and I know that sound barrier walls work great there, so why not here.  It is a good way to keep property value up, protect the viewshed to some degree and keep the area desirable to living standards.  Thanks for putting up this page for logging comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOT Lanes Update: Share your views on the Shirlington Rotary proposal by Lynn Beasley</title>
		<link>http://www.davidenglin.org/2009/06/26/hot-lanes/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Beasley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidenglin.org/?p=1934#comment-58</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of expanding metro to Shirlington, but I don&#039;t think that it is possible.  Why not have metro bus lines that go directly into D.C. (skip Pentagon).

Also, it would be great if the speed limit in Parkfairfax and Fairlington could be dropped to 15 miles/hour and aggressively enforced (talk about a revenue generator!)  I believe that 20 miles/hour over the speed limit is reckless driving.  People seem to think that because there are double yellow lines through the neighborhoods, that they can drive 55 (I see this a lot early mornings).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of expanding metro to Shirlington, but I don&#8217;t think that it is possible.  Why not have metro bus lines that go directly into D.C. (skip Pentagon).</p>
<p>Also, it would be great if the speed limit in Parkfairfax and Fairlington could be dropped to 15 miles/hour and aggressively enforced (talk about a revenue generator!)  I believe that 20 miles/hour over the speed limit is reckless driving.  People seem to think that because there are double yellow lines through the neighborhoods, that they can drive 55 (I see this a lot early mornings).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOT Lanes Update: Share your views on the Shirlington Rotary proposal by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.davidenglin.org/2009/06/26/hot-lanes/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidenglin.org/?p=1934#comment-57</guid>
		<description>The “idea” of signal lights is that more cars can pass through an intersection safer and faster when the light is green, thereby reducing backups when the light is red to levels lower than they are now—at least I hope that is the engineers’ idea.  In practice, I have personally not seen a successfully signalized traffic circle, but the circle in its current state is by no means successful either.  Has DOT provided any modeling?  They should be able to offer a comparison of current traffic counts on each road against those of the models with the signalization.  At least that would be an informed basis from that we could all relate to.   
 
And no noise barriers!  They are aesthetic crap.  They create concrete canyons on one side, no-man’s land on the other, and limit site lines on both sides.  Do we want I-66 or the Dulles Toll Road in our back yard?  Appropriate tree plantings will filter noise better—masonry only reflects it somewhere else—allow a better feeling of open space through varied canopy heights and staggered groupings, and offset some of the carbon sequestration lost in the VDOT’s current slash-and-burn on the Beltway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The “idea” of signal lights is that more cars can pass through an intersection safer and faster when the light is green, thereby reducing backups when the light is red to levels lower than they are now—at least I hope that is the engineers’ idea.  In practice, I have personally not seen a successfully signalized traffic circle, but the circle in its current state is by no means successful either.  Has DOT provided any modeling?  They should be able to offer a comparison of current traffic counts on each road against those of the models with the signalization.  At least that would be an informed basis from that we could all relate to.   </p>
<p>And no noise barriers!  They are aesthetic crap.  They create concrete canyons on one side, no-man’s land on the other, and limit site lines on both sides.  Do we want I-66 or the Dulles Toll Road in our back yard?  Appropriate tree plantings will filter noise better—masonry only reflects it somewhere else—allow a better feeling of open space through varied canopy heights and staggered groupings, and offset some of the carbon sequestration lost in the VDOT’s current slash-and-burn on the Beltway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

